Author name: Dr. Chetan Kalal

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Liver Cancer): Stages, Treatment, and When Transplant Is the Answer

Reviewed by Dr. Chetan Kalal, Hepatologist and Liver Transplant Physician, Mumbai. Last updated: August 2026. The short answer Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. In the large majority of patients it does not appear in a healthy liver — it grows inside a liver already damaged by cirrhosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or fatty liver disease. That single fact governs everything that follows: treatment has to deal with two diseases at once, the tumour and the failing liver underneath it. Whether HCC is curable depends almost entirely on when it is found, not on how aggressive it looks. Found early, on a routine six-monthly scan in a patient known to have cirrhosis, it is often curable — by surgery, by ablation, or by liver transplant. Found late, when the patient first develops symptoms, the goal usually shifts from cure to control. If you or a family member has just been told there is a mass in the liver, the most useful thing you can do in the next week is get the case in front of a hepatologist or a liver multidisciplinary team before any treatment is started. Sequence matters enormously in this disease, and the first decision often closes or opens the door to a cure. Why liver cancer behaves differently from other cancers In most cancers, the organ around the tumour is healthy. Surgeons can remove a generous margin and the organ recovers. The liver is different. In HCC, the surrounding liver is usually cirrhotic — scarred, stiff, and working at reduced capacity. That creates two problems that shape every treatment decision: You cannot always remove the tumour safely. A cirrhotic liver may not have enough healthy reserve left to survive a large resection. A patient may have a technically removable tumour and still be inoperable, because the liver that remains would fail. The rest of the liver is also at risk. Cirrhosis is a field defect. Even after a tumour is perfectly removed, the remaining liver continues to generate new tumours. This is why recurrence rates after resection are high, and why transplant — which removes the whole diseased organ — occupies a unique place in liver cancer that it does not occupy in most other cancers. This is also the reason a liver cancer diagnosis should be managed by a team that includes a hepatologist, not by tumour-directed treatment alone. Assessing how much liver function is left is as important as measuring the tumour. Who is at risk, and who should be screened HCC is not a random event. It has a well-defined at-risk population, which is what makes screening possible. You are in the at-risk group if you have: Cirrhosis of any cause — alcohol-related, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, fatty liver disease (MASLD/MASH), autoimmune, or others Chronic hepatitis B infection, in whom liver cancer can develop even without cirrhosis — a pattern particularly relevant in India and much of Asia Advanced fibrosis from fatty liver disease, increasingly the fastest-growing risk group in Indian practice Prior hepatitis C that has been cured but had already caused cirrhosis — the risk falls after cure but does not fall to zero, and surveillance continues What screening actually is: an ultrasound of the abdomen every six months, usually with a blood test for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). It is not expensive, it is not invasive, and it is the single intervention that most reliably converts an incurable liver cancer into a curable one. The uncomfortable reality in India is that most patients with HCC arrive at a specialist having never had a surveillance scan — often because nobody told them their fatty liver or their hepatitis B carried a cancer risk at all. If you have been told you have cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B and you are not on a six-monthly scan, that is a gap worth closing this month. How liver cancer is diagnosed Liver cancer is one of the few solid tumours that can be confidently diagnosed without a biopsy. In a patient known to have cirrhosis, a lesion showing the characteristic blood-flow pattern on a multiphase CT or MRI — enhancing brightly in the arterial phase, then washing out in the later phases — is diagnostic of HCC in its own right. This matters practically. It means the diagnostic pathway is: Ultrasound picks up a suspicious lesion Triple-phase CT or MRI of the liver characterises it — this is the decisive test, and a plain CT scan is not adequate Blood tests — liver function, clotting, AFP, viral markers Endoscopy to look for varices, because portal hypertension changes what treatment is safe Staging scans to check for spread outside the liver Biopsy is reserved for cases where imaging is not conclusive, or where the liver is not cirrhotic and the diagnosis is genuinely in doubt. If you have been advised a biopsy before a proper multiphase scan has been done, ask why. Staging: what the stage actually determines Liver cancer is not staged the way most cancers are. The system used internationally — the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system — combines three things: the tumour, the function of the liver, and how well the patient is functioning day to day. All three drive the treatment decision. Stage What it means Treatment usually considered Very early (0) A single small tumour, well-preserved liver function Ablation or surgical resection — potentially curative Early (A) Single tumour, or up to three small tumours; good liver function; patient fully active Resection, ablation, or liver transplant — potentially curative Intermediate (B) Multiple tumours confined to the liver, no vascular invasion or spread TACE or TARE (treatment delivered through the artery feeding the tumour); some patients can be downstaged toward transplant Advanced (C) Tumour invading blood vessels, or spread outside the liver Systemic therapy — modern immunotherapy-based combinations Terminal (D) Severely impaired liver function or very poor performance status Best supportive care; transplant assessment in highly selected cases Two people with identical-looking scans can end

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Liver Cancer): Stages, Treatment, and When Transplant Is the Answer Read More »

लिवर फेल होना (ACLF) क्या है? कारण, लक्षण और इलाज — डॉ. चेतन कलाल, मुंबई

लिवर फेल होना (ACLF) क्या है? कारण, लक्षण और इलाज — डॉ. चेतन कलाल, मुंबई Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a medical emergency in which a patient with existing but often undiagnosed chronic liver disease develops sudden jaundice, bleeding tendency, and organ failure within days to weeks. It carries a high short-term risk and needs specialist ICU-level care, not routine outpatient management. Dr Chetan Kalal, DM Hepatology, is a member of the APASL AARC (Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver — ACLF Research Consortium) working group and has co-authored the international consensus definitions used to diagnose and grade this condition. This Hindi-language guide explains what “लिवर फेल होना” actually means, why it happens, and when to seek help. बहुत से मरीज और परिवार जब पहली बार सुनते हैं कि “लिवर फेल हो गया है”, तो घबरा जाते हैं — और यह घबराहट गलत भी नहीं है। पर हर बार लिवर फेल होने का मतलब एक जैसा नहीं होता। डॉक्टरी भाषा में जिस स्थिति की बात हम यहां कर रहे हैं, उसे Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) कहा जाता है — यानी ऐसा व्यक्ति जिसे पहले से लिवर की कोई पुरानी बीमारी (जैसे सिरोसिस, फैटी लिवर या हेपेटाइटिस) थी, भले ही उसका पता चला हो या न चला हो, उसमें अचानक कुछ दिनों से कुछ हफ्तों के भीतर पीलिया, खून बहने की प्रवृत्ति और एक या एक से अधिक अंगों का काम करना बंद होने लगता है। यह सामान्य सिरोसिस से अलग है — यहां बीमारी अचानक और तेज़ी से बिगड़ती है, और समय पर सही इलाज न मिले तो जान को खतरा बढ़ जाता है। डॉ. चेतन कलाल — मुंबई के ग्लेनईगल्स अस्पताल में हेपेटोलॉजिस्ट और लिवर ट्रांसप्लांट फिजिशियन — APASL के AARC (ACLF Research Consortium) वर्किंग ग्रुप के सदस्य हैं और इस विषय पर अंतरराष्ट्रीय सहमति-पत्रों (consensus guidelines) के सह-लेखक रह चुके हैं। यह जानकारी शिक्षा के उद्देश्य से है — किसी भी लक्षण के लिए कृपया सीधे विशेषज्ञ से मिलें। ACLF की परिभाषा — यह सामान्य सिरोसिस से कैसे अलग है APASL (एशिया पैसिफिक एसोसिएशन फॉर द स्टडी ऑफ द लिवर) की सहमति के अनुसार, ACLF तब कहलाता है जब पहले से मौजूद क्रॉनिक लिवर बीमारी वाले मरीज में कोई नया आघात (acute insult) — जैसे शराब का सेवन दोबारा शुरू होना, वायरल हेपेटाइटिस का भड़कना, या कोई दवा — लिवर को अचानक और तेज़ी से नुकसान पहुंचाता है। इसके परिणामस्वरूप 4 हफ्तों के भीतर पीलिया और कोऐगुलोपैथी (खून का ठीक से न जमना) के साथ-साथ जलोदर (पेट में पानी भरना) या हेपेटिक एन्सेफैलोपैथी (भ्रम, नींद जैसी स्थिति) विकसित हो सकती है। डॉ. कलाल और APASL AARC समूह द्वारा प्रकाशित कार्य — जिसमें 2025 का “Kyoto Consensus” शामिल है — इसी परिभाषा को एशियाई मरीजों के अनुरूप और स्पष्ट करने का काम करते हैं। गंभीरता मापने के लिए AARC स्कोर का इस्तेमाल होता है, जो बिलीरुबिन, INR, क्रिएटिनिन, लैक्टेट और एन्सेफैलोपैथी के ग्रेड को मिलाकर तय करता है कि मरीज को ग्रेड I, II या III ACLF है — और इलाज की दिशा इसी ग्रेडिंग पर निर्भर करती है। ACLF के मुख्य कारण भारतीय और एशियाई मरीजों में ACLF को ट्रिगर करने वाले सबसे आम कारणों में शराब का दोबारा या अधिक सेवन, हेपेटाइटिस बी का अचानक भड़कना (reactivation), हेपेटाइटिस A या E का ऊपर से हो जाना (superimposed infection), और दवा या हर्बल/आयुर्वेदिक उत्पादों से लिवर को होने वाली चोट (drug-induced liver injury) शामिल हैं। डॉ. कलाल के सह-लेखन में प्रकाशित शोध ने यह भी दिखाया है कि कुछ सामान्य हर्बल उत्पाद — जैसे गिलोय (Tinospora cordifolia) — गलत तरीके से या बिना चिकित्सकीय सलाह के लंबे समय तक लिए जाने पर गंभीर लिवर क्षति और ACLF तक का कारण बन सकते हैं। सेप्सिस (शरीर में गंभीर संक्रमण) भी एक बड़ा ट्रिगर है। ध्यान देने वाली बात यह है कि बहुत बार मरीज को यह पता ही नहीं होता कि उसे पहले से लिवर की कोई बीमारी थी — इसलिए यह स्थिति “अचानक” और डरावनी लगती है, जबकि असल में लिवर पहले से ही कमजोर हो चुका होता है। पहचानने योग्य लक्षण और चेतावनी के संकेत आंखों और त्वचा का पीला पड़ना, पेशाब का गहरा रंग, पेट का अचानक फूलना (जलोदर), बिना किसी चोट के शरीर पर नील पड़ना या मसूड़ों से खून आना, अत्यधिक थकान, और भ्रम या असामान्य नींद (हेपेटिक एन्सेफैलोपैथी की शुरुआत) — ये सभी संकेत हैं जिन्हें नज़रअंदाज़ नहीं करना चाहिए। जिन मरीजों को पहले से सिरोसिस, फैटी लिवर या हेपेटाइटिस बी/सी का पता है, उनमें ये लक्षण विशेष रूप से गंभीरता से लेने चाहिए। डॉ. कलाल के सह-लेखन में प्रकाशित एक अध्ययन (2025) ने यह भी दर्शाया है कि जिन मरीजों को डायबिटीज़ भी है और उन्हें शराब-संबंधी ACLF होता है, उनमें मृत्यु का जोखिम अपेक्षाकृत अधिक पाया गया — इसलिए डायबिटीज़ पर नियंत्रण रखना सिरोसिस के मरीजों के लिए विशेष रूप से महत्वपूर्ण है। यदि परिवार में किसी को ये लक्षण एक साथ या तेज़ी से बढ़ते दिखें, तो घर पर इंतज़ार करने के बजाय तुरंत किसी हेपेटोलॉजिस्ट या लिवर ट्रांसप्लांट सेंटर से संपर्क करना चाहिए। इलाज का तरीका — ICU देखभाल से लिवर ट्रांसप्लांट तक ACLF का इलाज हमेशा अस्पताल में, अक्सर ICU स्तर की निगरानी में होता है, क्योंकि स्थिति घंटों में बदल सकती है। पहला कदम है ट्रिगर करने वाले कारण का पता लगाना और उसका इलाज करना — चाहे वह संक्रमण हो, शराब हो या कोई दवा। साथ ही, कोऐगुलोपैथी, किडनी के कार्य में गिरावट (एक्यूट किडनी इंजरी), और एन्सेफैलोपैथी जैसी जटिलताओं को सम्भालना ज़रूरी होता है। पोषण (न्यूट्रिशन) की भूमिका को अक्सर कम आंका जाता है — डॉ. कलाल की अपनी प्रकाशित रैंडमाइज़्ड कंट्रोल्ड ट्रायल में यह दिखाया गया है कि शराब-संबंधी सिरोसिस के मरीजों में सही और आक्रामक पोषण चिकित्सा जीवित रहने की संभावना को बेहतर करने में मदद कर सकती है। चुनिंदा मरीजों में, विशेषज्ञ केंद्रों पर प्लाज़्मा एक्सचेंज जैसी उपचार पद्धतियों पर भी विचार किया जाता है, जिसका अध्ययन डॉ. कलाल के शोध समूह ने AARC नेटवर्क के भीतर किया है। लेकिन सबसे महत्वपूर्ण बात यह समझनी चाहिए — जिन मरीजों में दवा से लिवर ठीक होने के संकेत नहीं

लिवर फेल होना (ACLF) क्या है? कारण, लक्षण और इलाज — डॉ. चेतन कलाल, मुंबई Read More »

“You’re Not Overweight. You Don’t Have Diabetes. So Why Do You Have Fatty Liver?” — Dr Kalal Writes for HealthAndMe

Dr Chetan Kalal, Associate Director of Hepatology and Liver Transplant at Gleneagles Hospital Mumbai, writes for HealthAndMe on lean MASLD — why lean, non-diabetic Indians develop fatty liver despite a normal BMI.

“You’re Not Overweight. You Don’t Have Diabetes. So Why Do You Have Fatty Liver?” — Dr Kalal Writes for HealthAndMe Read More »

Rising heat in asia impact on organs

Rising Heat In Asia The Toll it takes on Your Organs As heatwaves continue to get stronger across Asia, we take a look at how this excessive heat impacts the different organs in the human body. The Liver When the core [body] temperature goes above 40°C, it causes hepatocyte [damage], meaning liver cells damage and necrosis. There could also be dehydration. Dehydration would lead to reduced blood flow. That will cause an ischemia-reperfusion injury because of the sluggish flow or reduced flow. Dr Chetan Kalal, Associate Director, Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Gleneagles Hospital Dr Kalal said that the liver is among the first organs to fail in these extreme heat conditions. A research paper published in January 2026 also highlighted that the liver is one of the earliest organs to be damaged in case of a heat-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The paper said that the liver is particularly vulnerable to temperature fluctuations. Acute liver injury (ALI) and acute liver failure (ALF) are serious complications and are direct causes of patient death.

Rising heat in asia impact on organs Read More »

“Liver Is Among the First to Fail in Extreme Heat” — Dr Kalal Quoted in Asian Dispatch

Dr Chetan Kalal, Associate Director of Hepatology and Liver Transplant at Gleneagles Hospital Mumbai, is quoted in Asian Dispatch’s investigation into how rising Asian temperatures damage the body’s organs — with the liver among the first to fail when core body temperature exceeds 40°C.

“Liver Is Among the First to Fail in Extreme Heat” — Dr Kalal Quoted in Asian Dispatch Read More »

What Disqualifies You From a Liver Transplant? A Hepatologist Explains Absolute vs. Reversible Contraindications

“Why was I turned down?” is one of the hardest conversations in transplant hepatology — and one of the most misunderstood. Patients often assume a “no” is final. In most cases, it isn’t. It’s a “not yet,” tied to a specific, often reversible reason. Understanding the real categories — permanent vs. temporary, medical vs. donor-related — changes how patients respond to a difficult evaluation outcome. If you’re wondering whether you should be evaluated at all, start with am I a good candidate for a liver transplant. The two categories that matter Absolute contraindications — conditions where transplant surgery itself would very likely do more harm than the disease being treated, regardless of timing. Relative / reversible contraindications — conditions that currently make transplant unsafe or premature, but that can potentially be treated, stabilized, or resolved before reassessment. Most patients I see who are initially declined fall into the second category. That distinction is worth repeating to every patient who hears “no” for the first time. Absolute contraindications Active, uncontrolled extrahepatic malignancy (cancer outside the liver that has spread) Severe, irreversible cardiac or pulmonary disease that makes major surgery unsafe Ongoing, uncontrolled sepsis Advanced HCC with extensive vascular invasion or spread beyond transplant criteria Inability to comply with lifelong immunosuppression (severe, unaddressed psychiatric or cognitive impairment without a support structure) Relative contraindications — the “not yet” category This is where most real-world evaluations land, and where careful management can change the outcome entirely. Active alcohol or substance use. I don’t apply a fixed abstinence period as a hard rule — this is genuinely case-by-case. What I weigh: whether this is a first episode or a recurrent pattern of alcohol-related hepatitis, the strength of the patient’s social and psychological support system, and — critically — insight. A patient who understands why they’re here and what a relapse would cost them post-transplant is a different case from one who doesn’t, even if the liver numbers look identical. Duration of abstinence expected before listing follows the same case-by-case logic, not a fixed calendar rule. Active infection. A controlled, treated infection is not an automatic exclusion — carefully selected cases can proceed once infection is under control, rather than waiting for complete resolution in every instance. Poor nutritional status / sarcopenia. Often addressable with a pre-transplant optimization program rather than disqualifying on its own. Uncontrolled cardiac risk factors. Frequently manageable with cardiology optimization before reassessment. Advanced age alone. Age is just a number. I’ve evaluated physiologically fit patients well beyond the age most people assume is a cutoff — what matters is functional status, not the birth certificate. Psychosocial instability or lack of support system. Often addressable through counseling and building a support plan, not an automatic exclusion. When I see this on evaluation, I don’t treat it as a closed door — I sit down with the patient and family, name the gap plainly, and work out concretely who fills it: a family member taking responsibility for medication timing, a structured follow-up plan, a social worker brought in early. The goal is a real support plan on paper before relisting, not a vague reassurance. Case: recovery without transplant. A young male presented with a first episode of severe alcoholic hepatitis — a Maddrey discriminant function score above 80, meeting criteria for severe disease, and a clinical picture that looked transplant-bound on the surface. A sepsis screen came back negative. With steroid therapy and aggressive nutritional support, he recovered without needing transplantation. This is the case I point to when patients assume a severe presentation automatically means surgery — a first episode, in the right patient, with the right support, can resolve with medical management alone. Donor-side disqualification (LDLT-specific) In living donor transplant, the donor can also be found unsuitable, independent of the recipient’s status: Blood type incompatibility — not automatically disqualifying. ABO-incompatible (ABOI) transplant is an option in selected patient cohorts. In adult living-donor series with modern desensitization protocols (rituximab-based), reported 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival runs in the low-to-mid 70s–80s percent range, broadly comparable to ABO-compatible LDLT in the same cohorts — for example, one adult cohort reported 1-/3-/5-year survival of 81.7%/75.7%/71.0% for ABOI versus 81.0%/75.2%/71.5% for ABO-compatible recipients, with 3-year graft and patient survival of 89.2% and 92.3% respectively. Insufficient graft-to-recipient weight ratio Donor medical conditions that make major surgery unsafe for a healthy person Evidence of coercion or lack of true informed consent — donor evaluation includes independent psychological assessment specifically to screen for this Case: ABOI, early transplant in ACLF. A 55-year-old male with acute-on-chronic liver failure was deteriorating rapidly — this was a case where waiting for a matched donor wasn’t a realistic option given the trajectory. His wife came forward to donate. She was not a blood-group match, and the transplant proceeded as an ABO-incompatible transplant, within the selected-cohort protocol where outcomes are acceptable with appropriate desensitization and monitoring. Early transplantation in this setting is often the deciding factor between survival and rapid decline. When a willing donor is found unsuitable, how that’s communicated matters as much as the medical decision itself. My approach: thank them explicitly for their generosity, then be direct — a thorough evaluation has determined we cannot safely proceed, because donor safety is the absolute priority in this field, full stop. I make clear this isn’t a reflection of their health in general — it means their specific anatomy isn’t suited to the extreme demands of donation, which is a narrow, technical finding, not a verdict on them as a person. It’s difficult news, but protecting the donor’s long-term wellbeing is non-negotiable, and we turn immediately to exploring alternative options for the patient rather than leaving the family at a dead end. What happens after a “no” Being declined at one point in time is not a permanent verdict for most relative contraindications. The typical path: Identify the specific reversible factor Treat or optimize it Reassess at an interval matched to the clinical picture Timelines aren’t one-size-fits-all. In the most rapidly progressive

What Disqualifies You From a Liver Transplant? A Hepatologist Explains Absolute vs. Reversible Contraindications Read More »

Book AppointmentDr. Chetan Kalal · Hepatologist